case law citation us - An Overview
case law citation us - An Overview
Blog Article
Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only completed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees apply.
However, decisions rendered because of the Supreme Court of the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues in the Constitution and federal regulation.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
With the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.
Several judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name on the ECL based about the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police should be to website apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided through the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
Any court may well seek out to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to reach a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.